Abduction

From this shot the camera uses tracking to reveal what is visible of a car below on a road using a high angle shot. The tree's still cover the majority of the frame but a new source is introduced. In the next couple of seconds it is obvious the camera is tracking this remote car as the tree's that were in focus before are not covering the road. From this point i have noticed a long take has been used to cover these identified shots, using no cuts. The pace relies on the subject we are drawn to: an accurate pace of a car. This may try to represent the cars pace, to give a sense of realism for the audience to have relation to the driver.
Now I can identify the first cut that has been used to jump closer to our subject. It uses a plain straight-in transition to emphasize our approach rather than using a fade which may create a slow reaction which will just drag the shot out. It is still filmed from an high angle shot, almost a birds eye view.
As the camera wants to stay parallel with the fast pace coming from our subject, a shallow depth of field has naturally been created which makes the trees visible in the frame out of focus. It seems the light is
Still using the same take without any cuts in between but rather zooming in closer to our subject, a character has become visible on the bonnet of the car while the vehicle is still moving. We as an audience are immediately questioning the boundaries this character has as they seem they go the extreme to have a good time to rebel.
This is the second cut i can identify, again it uses a straight in transition to avoid dragging out the shot. It is filmed from a low angle directly facing the lower front of the car only, that then hovers over the subject into a high angle which reveals our newly introduced character in a more comforting shot to familiarise ourselves of the character.to conclude the intro of 'Abduction', I believe the film producers want their audience to egstinguish the characters lifestyle and question why they have this attitude. Possibly rebelling against their free will, or putting on an act to cover up their damaged background?
_____________________________________________
Hidden
Originally i suspected this was a still image but a distant character becomes visible crossing the frame at a fast pace. There is no dialogue but vague sound coming from their movement. From what i can see, this character is dressed in smart costume, a suit at that - which often suggests wealth and a good job. He may possibly live in this location.
More into this take, i can identify two more characters that separately enter then exit the frame. The second character I cannot visualize as they are dressed in all black who then pass' a dark car which camouflages them before they exit the frame. They may be dressed in this way for the audience to suspect what they do for a living and do they really live in the building they came out of that is straight ahead of the camera? Moreover, the majority of this particular building is hidden by a large bush.
______________________________________________________
Lighting introduces the film by a match stick being lit with a naked flame to transfer onto a candle. The sound coming from the match stick being dragged across the box is exaggerated to possibly suggest the films 'plot point'.
This long take i have verified runs on a naked flame guiding us from wall to wall revealing possible memorial photographs hung, further leading us towards a destination. A none-diegetic soundtrack is playing over the shot which sounds like a flute and light beat of a drum which produces a suspicious rhythm to create a little discomfort for the audience. It does not suggest a positive nor negative mood, but an approach of it to soon be discovered.
Later into the take, a door is opened which implies to the audience this may be a characters action and furthermore the camera may be encouraged to film from a characters perspective. So now we know the candle that occurs in every shot until now may be held by our suspected character. The candles light in this same take reveals what is visible of a bedroom. Back to the idea of our characters perspective, i think this shot is filmed from a slight high angle looking down at a subject in the room. It is had for the audience to verify what the subject is just yet due to the minimum light source that has been used in every shot other than our significant candle.
This long take stops suddenly on a close-up of another character asleep, then awakening by the convenient approaching light. This automatically raises questions from the audience. Who are they? Why are they there? Do they live there?
We still aren't familiar with our original characters appearance and who the may be as an individual. More questions are being raised on this other character such as 'are they breaking into the opposing characters home?' or 'are they actually a close relation just visiting?'
The scene being set at night creates more realism to the shot as the fire is a significant on screen light source that catches the audiences attention.




Who has posted this. I hope that this is not counting a s a post of one of your 5 thrillers - this is not a textual analysis!
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteGood, do finish this one off Jo
ReplyDeleteJo, there was only one on the deadline. Your are still several short. Why? Don't get behind. You are therefore cause for concerned!
ReplyDelete